Corporate Shareholder Disputes & Joint Ventures in Turkey

We advise and represent foreign investors, minority shareholders, and joint venture partners in corporate disputes, enforcing minority protections, filing director liability claims under TCC Art. 553, and dissolving partnerships under Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102.

Av. Onur ÇalışıcıIstanbul Bar reg. no 83426

In brief

  1. Minority shareholders holding 10% in private Joint Stock Companies (5% in public) may, under TCC Art. 411, ask the board in writing to call a general meeting or to put items on the agenda; if the board refuses or does not respond within seven business days, the commercial court may order the meeting and appoint a trustee (kayyım) to call it (TCC Art. 412).
  2. General Assembly resolutions that violate law, articles of association, or the statutory rule of good faith can be challenged by an action for annulment filed within 3 months of the resolution date under TCC Article 445, by the persons listed in Article 446.
  3. Founders, board members, managers and liquidators who breach their duties under the law or the articles of association through their fault are liable under TCC Article 553 for the damage caused to the company, the shareholders and the company's creditors.
  4. Where it is necessary for exercising shareholder rights, a shareholder who has already used the right to information or inspection may ask the general assembly for a special audit (TCC Art. 438); if the assembly refuses, holders of 10% of the capital (5% in public companies) or of shares with a total nominal value of at least TRY 1 million may apply to the commercial court within three months for a special auditor (Özel Denetçi) under TCC Art. 439.
  5. Where just cause exists, holders of at least 10% of the capital (5% in public companies) may ask the commercial court to dissolve the company under TCC Art. 531; instead of dissolution, the court may order that the claimants be paid the real value of their shares and leave the company, or adopt another appropriate and acceptable solution.

Cross-border Joint Ventures (JV), private equity investments, and multi-partner Turkish corporations often face internal shareholder friction that escalates into severe governance deadlocks, majority oppression, asset stripping, or unauthorized capital increases. When majority shareholders attempt to freeze out foreign investors or dilute minority equity, negotiations often depend on knowing which statutory remedies are available.

Read the full section

Lex Lata conducts corporate litigation and dispute advisory for foreign investors, venture capital funds, and minority partners in Turkey. We work under the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (TCC) and international arbitration rules to protect shareholder rights and pursue the available exit remedies.


1. Statutory Minority Shareholder Protections (TCC Art. 411-439)

Under Turkish law, shareholders possessing at least 10% of the share capital in private Joint Stock Companies (A.Ş.) or 5% in publicly traded companies enjoy statutory minority rights; the articles of association may depart from the joint stock company provisions of the Code only where the Code expressly allows it (TCC Art. 340):

Show the 4 points
  • Right to Convene Extraordinary General Assembly (TCC Art. 411): Minority shareholders may ask the board in writing, through a notary, stating the reasons and the agenda, to call a general meeting or to put specific items on the agenda. If the board refuses or does not respond positively within seven business days, the commercial court may order the meeting to be called and appoint a trustee (kayyım) to call it (TCC Art. 412).
  • Right to Postpone Balance Sheet Discussions (TCC Art. 420): On the request of the minority, discussion of the financial statements and related matters is postponed by one month by decision of the meeting chair, without a general assembly vote. A second postponement may be requested only if objections recorded in the minutes have not been answered.
  • Right to Request a Special Auditor (Özel Denetçi - TCC Art. 438/439): Where it is necessary for exercising shareholder rights, a shareholder who has already used the right to information or inspection may ask the general assembly for a special audit of specific events (Art. 438). If the assembly refuses, the minority (or holders of shares with a total nominal value of at least TRY 1 million) may apply to the commercial court within three months; the court appoints a special auditor if the applicants show convincingly that founders or company organs breached the law or the articles and harmed the company or the shareholders (Art. 439).
  • Right to Petition for Judicial Dissolution for Just Cause (TCC Art. 531): Where just cause exists, the minority may ask the commercial court to dissolve the company. Instead of dissolution, the court may order that the claimants be paid the real value of their shares as at the date nearest the judgment and leave the company, or adopt another appropriate and acceptable solution.

2. Annulment and Nullity of General Assembly Resolutions (TCC Art. 445-447)

When majority shareholders pass resolutions aimed at siphoning company profits, approving unjustifiable capital increases to dilute minority holdings, or granting self-dealing contracts to related entities:

Legal ActionGoverning ArticleStatutory GroundsLimitation Period
Action for AnnulmentTCC Art. 445Resolutions violating law, articles of association, or good faith rules (dürüstlük kuralı).3 months from the resolution date (hak düşürücü süre).
Action for Absolute Nullity (Butlan)TCC Art. 447Resolutions that restrict or remove the rights to attend the general assembly, minimum voting, litigation and other inalienable rights; restrict information, inspection and audit rights beyond what the law allows; or destroy the company's basic structure or breach capital maintenance rules.The Code sets no time limit.
Action for Non-Existence (Yokluk)Commercial DoctrineFor example, a meeting called by a person with no power to call it, or a resolution adopted without the required quorum.No time limit (treated as never having come into existence).
Injunction on ExecutionTCC Art. 449Once an annulment or nullity action is filed, the court may suspend execution of the resolution after obtaining the views of the board members.Requested within the annulment or nullity action.
Read the full section

The three-month period in Article 445 runs from the date of the resolution, not from the day the shareholder learns of it, and once it lapses only nullity under Article 447 (or non-existence) can still be raised. Where that line falls, and which defects genuinely cross it, is examined in annulment and nullity after the three-month deadline.


3. Director & Board Member Personal Liability (TCC Art. 553)

Board members and third parties entrusted with management must perform their duties with the care of a prudent manager and protect the company’s interests in good faith (TCC Art. 369).

Read the full section

Under TCC Article 553, founders, board members, managers and liquidators who breach their duties under the law or the articles of association through their fault are liable for the damage caused to the company, the shareholders and the company’s creditors. Where several persons are liable for the same damage, each is jointly liable only to the extent the damage can be personally attributed to them according to their fault and the circumstances (TCC Art. 557). Typical grounds include:

  1. Breach of the Prohibition of Competition & Transactions with the Company (TCC 395/396): Entering into transactions with the company without General Assembly permission (Art. 395), or, without such permission, carrying out transactions within the company’s line of business or joining a competing company as a partner with unlimited liability (Art. 396).
  2. Corporate Opportunity Usurpation: Diverting profitable business contracts or commercial opportunities from the Turkish company to private or family-owned enterprises.
  3. Mismanagement & Capital Dissipation (TCC 376): Failing to call the general assembly and propose remedial measures when half of the capital and legal reserves is lost, failing to act at the two-thirds threshold, or failing to notify the court where the company is over-indebted.
  4. False Financial Reporting: Preparing misleading balance sheets or concealing company reserves.

4. Joint Venture Deadlock Resolution & Squeeze-Out Remedies

In 50-50 Joint Ventures or multi-tier corporate partnerships, shareholder deadlocks paralyze commercial operations. The available routes include:

Show the 3 points
  • Enforcement of Contractual Exit Clauses: Implementing Russian Roulette, Texas Shoot-out, Dutch Auction, and Call/Put option mechanisms embedded in Shareholders Agreements (SHA).
  • Interim Management & Judicial Custodians (Kayyım): Applying to the commercial court, by way of interim measures, for a trustee to protect the company’s assets while litigation proceeds.
  • Payment of the Real Value of Shares (TCC 531): In a dissolution action for just cause, the court may, instead of dissolution, order that the claimants be paid the real value of their shares and leave the company.

Where the relationship cannot be repaired at all, the question becomes which of the statutory exits applies and who has standing to bring it; those routes (withdrawal, expulsion and dissolution for just cause) are set out on our shareholder exit, expulsion and dissolution page, and the standing problem peculiar to a two-member limited company in expelling a shareholder from a two-member Turkish LLC.


5. ICC, LCIA and ISTAC Arbitration Enforcement

Where the underlying Shareholders Agreement or Joint Venture Agreement contains an international arbitration clause, we represent clients before the Istanbul Arbitration Centre (ISTAC), International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), and London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), and may apply to Turkish courts for interim measures (İhtiyati Tedbir) to secure assets during the arbitral proceedings.


For the wider governance context and documents to prepare for an initial review, see our corporate law overview for Türkiye.

Read the full section

Key figures

10%
statutory minority shareholding threshold in private A.Ş. (TCC 411)
3 Months
period from the resolution date to file an annulment action against General Assembly resolutions (TCC 445)
TCC 553
fault-based liability of directors for breach of duty
TCC 531
dissolution for just cause, or payment of the real value of the claimants' shares

5-Step Corporate Litigation & Shareholder Dispute Roadmap

  1. 1. Corporate Governance & MERSİS Forensic Audit

    We review articles of association, shareholder agreements (SHA), board resolution books, and Trade Registry (MERSİS) filings to identify violations.

  2. 2. Exercising Statutory Information Rights & Extraordinary Call

    We exercise the statutory rights to information and inspection (TCC 437) and serve the minority's call request for a general meeting through a notary (TCC 411).

  3. 3. Securing Commercial Injunctions (İhtiyati Tedbir)

    We apply to the commercial court for interim measures concerning disputed share transfers, board actions or capital increases, and, once an annulment or nullity action is filed, for suspension of the resolution's execution (TCC 449).

  4. 4. Court Petition for Special Auditor (TCC 438/439)

    Where the general assembly refuses a special audit, the qualifying minority may apply to the commercial court for a special auditor to clarify specific events such as related-party contracts or transfers of funds.

  5. 5. Annulment Litigation, Director Liability & Exit Buyout

    Depending on the facts: General Assembly annulment (TCC 445), director liability claims (TCC 553), and dissolution for just cause or payment of the real value of shares under TCC Art. 531.

Frequently asked questions

What statutory percentage constitutes a minority shareholder in Turkey?

Under Turkish Commercial Code (TCC) Article 411, shareholders holding at least 10% of the share capital in private Joint Stock Companies (Anonim Şirket / A.Ş.) or at least 5% in publicly traded companies form the statutory minority (Azlık). In Limited Liability Companies (Ltd. Şti.), every partner, regardless of share percentage, may ask the managers for information on all the company's business and accounts and inspect specific matters (TCC Art. 614).

What is the deadline to challenge an unlawful General Assembly resolution?

Under TCC Article 445, an Action for Annulment of General Assembly Resolutions (Genel Kurul Kararının İptali Davası) must be filed before the commercial court of the company's seat within three months of the resolution date. The Code describes this period as one that extinguishes the right (hak düşürücü süre, TCC Art. 448). Under Article 446, the action may be brought by a shareholder who attended, voted against and had the objection recorded in the minutes; by a shareholder, present or not, who alleges that the meeting was not properly called, the agenda was not properly announced, unauthorised persons voted or the shareholder was wrongly excluded, and that this affected the resolution; by the board of directors; and by any board member who would incur personal liability by implementing the resolution.

Can we force a forensic financial audit of a Turkish company against majority opposition?

Yes, within the limits of the Code. Under TCC Article 438, where it is necessary for exercising shareholder rights, any shareholder who has already used the right to information or inspection may ask the general assembly to have specific events clarified by a special audit, even if the matter is not on the agenda. If the assembly approves, the company or any shareholder may apply to the commercial court within thirty days for a special auditor. If the assembly refuses, Article 439 allows holders of 10% of the capital (5% in public companies), or of shares with a total nominal value of at least TRY 1 million, to apply to the court within three months; the court appoints a special auditor if they show convincingly that founders or company organs breached the law or the articles and harmed the company or the shareholders.

Can board members be held personally liable for damaging the company?

Yes. Under TCC Article 553, board members and managers who breach their duties under the law or the articles of association through their fault are liable for the damage caused to the company, the shareholders and the company's creditors. Typical breaches include transactions with the company without general assembly permission (TCC 395) and breach of the non-competition rule (TCC 396). Where several persons are liable for the same damage, Article 557 makes each of them jointly liable only to the extent the damage can be personally attributed to them according to their fault and the circumstances.

What happens if a 50-50 Joint Venture reaches an irresolvable governance deadlock?

If the shareholders agreement contains deadlock resolution mechanisms (Russian Roulette, Texas Shoot-out, or call/put options), we act under them. In the absence of contractual clauses, holders of at least 10% of the capital may, where just cause exists, ask the commercial court under TCC Article 531 to dissolve the company; the court may instead order that the claimants be paid the real value of their shares as at the date nearest the judgment and leave the company, or adopt another appropriate and acceptable solution.

Can foreign shareholders enforce Shareholders Agreements (SHA) signed abroad in Turkish courts?

Yes. Shareholders agreements that do not contravene mandatory provisions of law are valid between the parties, and Turkish courts give effect to valid arbitration agreements and choice of law provisions in them. A foreign arbitral award, for example from an ICC or LCIA arbitration seated abroad, may be enforced in Turkey through enforcement (tenfiz) proceedings under MÖHUK No. 5718, Articles 60-63, and the 1958 New York Convention, subject to the grounds for refusal in Article 62.

This page is general information, not legal advice. For advice on your specific situation, speak with a lawyer.

Av. Onur Çalışıcı

The lawyer on your file

Av. Onur Çalışıcı

Founding Attorney · Istanbul Bar Association · Bar reg. no 83426

Lex lata is Latin for “the law as it is”. The office was founded by Av. Onur Çalışıcı, and you deal with Av. Çalışıcı directly from the first meeting to the end of the matter. With foreign clients we write in English and explain what each Turkish document says.

Write to us with what happened and which documents you have. We will read it and get back to you. You can write in English or Turkish.

LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/onurcalisici

OfficeKarataş Sk. No:6, SNS Plaza Kat:3, Kağıthane, Istanbul

On screen

Beyaz TV · Beyaz Ana Haber · September 2026 · In Turkish

Evicting a tenant who disturbs the neighbours

Why a tenant's unbearable conduct has to be shown with concrete evidence, and the exceptional cases in which the 30-day period may not be required.

Office and events

Gürsel Mah., Karataş Sk. No:6, SNS Plaza Kat:3, Kağıthane / İstanbul · Address and directions

The Lex Lata office in Kağıthane, Istanbul: desks and wall screens showing the Lex Lata logo
The office · Kağıthane, Istanbul
Av. Onur Çalışıcı on the blockchain law panel at Blockchain Expo World, Istanbul, July 2024
Blockchain law panel · Blockchain Expo World, Istanbul · July 2024
A meeting around the table in the Lex Lata meeting room
Meeting room · Kağıthane, Istanbul

SNS Plaza, Kağıthane, IstanbulContact page