Geographical Indications in Türkiye

Turkish law recognises three distinct tools, and choosing the right one is the first strategic decision in any GI project:

• Designation of origin (menşe adı): production, processing and all other operations must take place entirely within the defined geographical area, and the product takes all or its essential characteristics from natural and human factors specific to that area. This is the strictest and strongest category, reserved for products whose qualities cannot be reproduced outside the region.
• Indication of source (mahreç işareti): at least one of production, processing or other operations takes place in the area, and the product is identified with that area by a distinctive quality, reputation or other characteristic. This suits products whose raw materials or key processing step is local, even if other stages happen elsewhere.
• Traditional product name (geleneksel ürün adı): protects a name that does not qualify as a designation of origin or indication of source but is proven to have been used traditionally in the relevant market for at least thirty years to describe a product, and that derives from a traditional production or processing method or composition, or from traditional raw materials (Article 34(3)).

At a glance, the three tools compare as follows:

What this means for you

If your product’s entire chain is rooted in one region, aim for a designation of origin; it gives the broadest protection and the strongest reputation signal. If only part of the chain is local, an indication of source is usually the realistic and defensible route. The application must state which category the name fits and prove it (Article 37), so getting this classification wrong can stall a file at TÜRKPATENT.

Law No. 6769 consolidated trademarks, patents, designs and geographical indications into a single code and brought Turkish practice closer to European Union standards. That alignment matters in practice: a specification drafted to Turkish standards under Law No. 6769 is a far better starting point for a later EU application than one built under the old regime.

A GI protects a region, not a company. That is its greatest strength and its most common blind spot: if no collective entity registers the name, the whole community stays without the protection the Law gives registered indications, and exposed to free-riders.

1. Examines the application, including the product specification, the defined area and the essential link between product and origin.
2. Publishes the application in the official bulletin, opening a three-month period in which third parties, or holders of earlier rights under Article 48, may file a reasoned written opposition (Article 40(2)), for example a competing region or a company that believes the boundaries or specification are wrong.
3. Registers the indication once no opposition has been filed within three months or oppositions are finally resolved, and the registration fee is paid within two months of notification, and enters it in the public register (Article 41).

Under Article 36, eligible applicants are producer groups; public bodies connected to the product or its area and professional organisations with public-institution status, such as chambers; associations, foundations and cooperatives working in the public interest for the product or authorised to protect their members’ economic interests; and a single producer, only if it proves it is the sole producer of the product. Even then, registration gives no exclusive right over the name (Article 44(7)).

What the application file must contain

The heart of the file is the product specification. A strong specification defines the product’s characteristics and quality, sets the geographical boundaries precisely, explains the causal link between origin and product, and, critically, establishes the inspection mechanism that will keep goods sold under the name within the registered standard (Articles 37 and 49). Inspection is carried out by an inspection body approved by TÜRKPATENT, and inspection reports are submitted to the Office every year from publication of the registration (Article 49(2)-(3)). This inspection framework is not a formality. It is what makes the right meaningful after registration: without credible controls, the indication becomes a label anyone can attach, and its value erodes. We treat the specification and inspection plan as the real engineering work of a GI, not an afterthought to the form.

In practice, the most useful preparatory step an applicant group can take before filing is internal alignment: agree in writing on who speaks for the collective, how the boundaries were drawn, and how producers who fall outside them will be handled. Oppositions can come not only from distant free-riders but also from neighbouring producers who feel excluded by the boundary line, and a file that anticipates those objections with documented reasoning is better placed to withstand them.

Available remedies under Law No. 6769 (Article 149) include:

• Injunctions to prevent and stop the infringing use, including preliminary injunctions to halt harm before judgment (Article 159).
• Compensation for material damage; moral damages cannot be claimed for geographical indications and traditional product names (Article 149(4)), and the lost-profit methods of Article 151 do not apply to them (Article 151(6)).
• Seizure of infringing goods and of the devices used exclusively to make them, and measures to stop the infringement continuing.
• Publication of the final judgment where there is a justified interest.

Law No. 6769 contains no criminal provision for geographical indications; its criminal provision (Article 30) covers trademarks only.

The registrant brings these claims before the civil courts for intellectual and industrial property rights (Article 156(1)). A person entitled to use the indication first asks the registrant, through a notary, to sue; if the registrant refuses or does not sue within three months, the user may sue itself, and where there is a risk of serious harm it may seek a preliminary injunction without waiting (Article 53(2)). Effective enforcement, though, depends on a working inspection and monitoring system. Registrants are expected to police the market actively: to check whether goods sold under the indication actually meet the registered specification and to gather the evidence a court will need. The strongest GI holders treat monitoring as a continuous operational duty, not a reaction to the occasional obvious knock-off.

• International recognition. Domestic registration protects a product inside Türkiye but not abroad. A GI registered only with TÜRKPATENT can still be copied in Germany or the Gulf. Producers exporting to the EU or other markets need separate registration in those systems or protection under bilateral and multilateral arrangements, planned early, before the export relationship is built.
• Producer awareness. Many regional producers hold genuinely distinctive products but have never registered them, leaving the name exposed to free-riding. Early registration is the most reliable safeguard.
• Governance and inspection. A GI is only as strong as the collective that stands behind it. Weak internal governance, an inspection body that never actually inspects, or producers who quietly cut corners will all undermine the right. Failure to carry out inspection as Article 49 requires is a ground for invalidity (Article 50(2)(c)) and can end the right (Articles 43 and 49(4)).

• Real Estate & Property Law: Title deed due diligence, foreign property acquisitions, and Land Registry (TKGM) transfers.
• Intellectual Property & Trademark Litigation: Trademark, patent, and copyright enforcement before TÜRKPATENT and IP Courts.
• Personal Data Protection (KVKK/GDPR): VERBİS registration, data inventory mapping, and cross-border data transfer compliance.
• Legal Matters in Istanbul for Foreign Clients and Companies: Full-service commercial and civil advocacy before Istanbul courthouses.