Unfair Competition Law in Türkiye

When a rival deceives the market, imitates your goods or leaks your trade secrets, Turkish law gives you concrete remedies, and we advise foreign and domestic businesses on using them.

Av. Onur ÇalışıcıIstanbul Bar reg. no 83426 · Updated June 2026

In brief

  1. Unfair competition is governed by the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102, articles 54-63, separate from antitrust rules.
  2. Article 55 lists the prohibited acts: misleading ads, disparagement, imitation, trade-secret misuse and inducing breach of contract.
  3. Under article 61 you can apply for an interim injunction to stop the conduct before the case is decided; this is often the key step.
  4. Article 56 claims include a declaration, a stop order, removal of the consequences, correction, damages where there is fault (which the court may measure by the defendant's likely gain) and moral damages.
  5. Limitation is short under article 60: one year from learning that the claim arose and in any event three years from its arising, unless a longer criminal limitation period applies.
  6. Intentionally committing an article 55 act can also be punished on complaint under article 62 with up to two years' imprisonment or a judicial fine.

Türkiye’s open, fast-growing economy draws businesses from every market, and with that competition comes the risk of deceptive advertising, copied products and leaked trade secrets. Unfair competition law exists to keep that competition honest. It is not about market dominance or cartels, which fall under separate competition (antitrust) rules enforced by the Competition Authority, but about the day-to-day conduct of one business toward its rivals and its customers. For a foreign company entering the Turkish market, understanding this regime is both a shield and a sword: it protects your brand and know-how, and it gives you legal means to stop a competitor who plays dirty.

Unfair competition in Türkiye is governed by the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (arts. 54-63). This is the core source, and under article 4 cases arising from it are commercial cases whether or not the parties are merchants: a small trader, a global brand and an online seller are all bound by the same standard of honest conduct.

Read the full section
  • Article 54 states the guiding principle: deceptive or otherwise good-faith-breaching conduct and commercial practices that affect relations between competitors, or between suppliers and customers, are unfair and unlawful. This general clause matters because it lets courts reach new forms of misconduct that no list could anticipate, such as fake online reviews or deceptive influencer campaigns.
  • Article 55 sets out a detailed, non-exhaustive catalogue of prohibited acts; this is the practical heart of the regime.
  • Articles 56-63 cover civil claims, the liability of employers and of press, broadcasting, communication and IT businesses, publication of the judgment, limitation, interim injunctions and criminal liability.

Because the general clause and the specific list work together, a claim can succeed even where the conduct does not fit neatly into one of the listed categories, as long as it breaches the underlying duty of good faith.

Foreign clients often conflate this regime with antitrust. The two are separate tracks with different rules, different forums and different remedies:

Unfair competitionCompetition (antitrust) law
Legal sourceTurkish Commercial Code No. 6102, arts. 54-63Law No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition
Typical conductMisleading ads, imitation, trade-secret misuseCartels, abuse of dominance, merger control
Who enforcesPrivate parties before the Commercial CourtsThe Competition Authority (plus private follow-on claims)
Core questionWas the conduct deceptive or in bad faith?Was competition in the market restricted?

What counts as unfair competition

Article 55 groups the most common violations into recognisable categories. In practice, disputes usually involve:

Show the 5 points
  • Misleading or disparaging statements: untrue or misleading claims about one’s own products, prices or business, or false, misleading or needlessly hurtful claims about a competitor (art. 55(1)(a)(1)-(2)). Untrue, misleading or needlessly denigrating comparative advertising falls here too (art. 55(1)(a)(5)).
  • Inducing breach or termination of contract: inducing customers to breach their contracts with others, offering a rival’s employees or agents undeserved benefits to make them act against their duties, or inducing them to disclose or obtain their employer’s secrets (art. 55(1)(b)).
  • Misuse of trade secrets: exploiting or disclosing production or business secrets obtained secretly, without permission or otherwise unlawfully, including secrets carried out by a departing employee (art. 55(1)(d)). This category has a practice of its own: see trade secrets and confidentiality disputes.
  • Imitation and free-riding: taking measures that cause confusion with another’s goods, work products or business (art. 55(1)(a)(4)), or taking over another’s market-ready work product by technical reproduction without an appropriate contribution of one’s own (art. 55(1)(c)(3)).
  • Unfair standard terms: using pre-formulated general terms that, misleadingly and to the other side’s detriment, depart materially from the applicable statutory rules or provide a distribution of rights and duties materially contrary to the nature of the contract (art. 55(1)(f)).

A rule of thumb for foreign clients: hard competition is welcome, deception is not. Beating a rival on price, quality or service is lawful; winning by lying about them, copying their look, or stealing their know-how is not.

What this means for you

If you are the one harmed, the practical question is rarely “is this immoral?” but “can I prove it fits article 54 or 55, and can I stop it now?” If you are the one accused, the defence usually lies in showing your conduct was accurate, independently developed, or ordinary competitive behaviour, not deception. Either way, the outcome is shaped early, by how quickly and how well the facts are captured.

A former employee’s conduct is often governed by a contractual covenant as well, whose penalty clause is examined in penalty clauses in non-compete covenants.


Remedies available to a claimant

Where a business is harmed, Article 56 gives the court a full toolkit. A claimant may seek an order:

Show the 5 points
  • establishing that the conduct is unfair;
  • prohibiting and stopping the conduct;
  • removing the material state of affairs it created (for example, recalling infringing packaging) and, where unavoidable to prevent infringement, destroying the means and goods used;
  • correcting false or misleading statements; and
  • compensating material damages where there is fault, and moral damages where the conditions of article 58 of the Turkish Code of Obligations are met.

Under Article 59, the court may also, at the winning party’s request, order publication of the final judgment at the losing party’s expense.

As compensation under article 56(1)(d), the court may also award an amount equal to the benefit the defendant could have obtained through the unfair competition, which matters where your own loss is hard to quantify but the rival’s gain is visible. Just as important, interim injunctions under article 61 can be obtained early to preserve the status quo and stop damaging conduct before a final judgment, often the decisive step in fast-moving markets, because a stop order that comes two years too late may protect nothing.

Criminal exposure

Under Article 62, intentionally committing an act listed in article 55, knowingly giving false or misleading information to have one’s offers preferred, deceiving employees to obtain their employer’s secrets, or as employer failing to prevent such an act by staff is punished, on the complaint of a person entitled to sue under article 56, with up to two years’ imprisonment or a judicial fine, unless the act constitutes a more serious crime. Under Article 63, where the act is committed in a legal entity’s business, this applies to the organ members or partners who acted or should have acted for it. Civil and criminal proceedings can therefore run in parallel; for a respondent, this is a reason to take even an informal cease-and-desist letter seriously.

Timing and evidence

Two points decide most cases.

Read the full section

First, limitation: under article 60, claims become time-barred one year after the claimant learns that they arose, and in any event three years after they arose; a longer criminal limitation period under the Turkish Penal Code applies instead where the act is also such a crime. These deadlines run quickly, and the earlier you move, the stronger an interim injunction application will be.

Preserve the evidence the moment you suspect a problem. Screenshot the advertisement, keep the emails, buy and store the copied product, and log who had access to the secret. The file you build early often shapes the case.

Second, evidence: unfair competition disputes turn on documented proof: advertisements, correspondence, product comparisons, and records showing how a trade secret was taken. Because Commercial Courts often refer these questions to an expert panel, a clear, well-organised file does double duty: it supports your injunction and it steers the expert’s conclusions.

For online misconduct, timing is even tighter. A misleading advertisement, a fake review campaign or a copied product listing can be edited or deleted within hours of a warning letter. Where the evidence is digital, we typically secure a notarised determination of the web content (a formal record made by a Turkish notary) before alerting the other side, so the proof survives whatever happens next.

How we help

We advise foreign and domestic businesses on both sides of these disputes:

  • assessing whether conduct crosses the line under arts. 54-63, before you commit to litigation;
  • applying for interim injunctions to stop ongoing harm;
  • pursuing or defending claims for damages, including damages measured by the defendant’s likely gain;
  • protecting trade secrets through contracts, warning letters and litigation; and
  • coordinating civil and criminal action where deliberate misconduct is involved.

The aim is practical: stop the harm, protect your position, and keep the market fair so that your business can compete on its merits.


Show the 4 points

Key figures

54-63
Turkish Commercial Code articles governing unfair competition
1 yr
Limitation period from learning that the claim arose
3 yrs
Outer limitation period from the claim arising
Art. 62
Criminal liability on complaint for deliberate acts

How an unfair competition claim proceeds

  1. Evidence capture

    We preserve the file early (screenshots, correspondence, product samples and access logs) before advertisements are pulled and trails go cold.

  2. Legal assessment

    We test whether the conduct fits articles 54-55 and weigh the strength of civil, injunctive and criminal routes before you commit.

  3. Warning letter

    A well-drafted cease-and-desist letter can stop the conduct without litigation and supports any later injunction application.

  4. Interim injunction

    Where the harm continues, we apply to the Commercial Court under article 61 for an interim injunction before the case is decided.

  5. Trial and remedies

    We pursue a declaration, a stop order, correction and damages through to final judgment.

Frequently asked questions

Which law governs unfair competition in Türkiye?

Unfair competition is regulated by the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102, articles 54 to 63. Article 54 sets the general principle that deceptive or otherwise good-faith-breaching conduct and commercial practices affecting relations between competitors, or between suppliers and customers, are unfair and unlawful. Article 55 lists the most common categories, from misleading advertising to breach of trade secrets. Importantly, under article 4 of the Code, cases arising from these provisions are commercial cases whether or not the parties are merchants.

What remedies can a claimant obtain?

Under article 56 a claimant may ask the court to establish that the conduct is unfair, to stop it, to remove the material state of affairs it created, to correct false or misleading statements and, where unavoidable, to destroy the means and goods used. Where there is fault, the claimant can recover damages, and the court may award as compensation the benefit the defendant could have obtained through the unfair competition; moral damages are available where the conditions of article 58 of the Turkish Code of Obligations are met. Under article 61 the court can order interim injunctions to halt harmful conduct while the case proceeds.

Is misleading advertising unfair competition?

Yes. Article 55 expressly treats untrue or misleading statements about one's own goods, work products, prices, stock or business, and disparaging others with false, misleading or needlessly hurtful statements, as unfair competition. Comparative advertising is unfair where the comparison is untrue or misleading, needlessly denigrates the rival or needlessly exploits its reputation. In practice, the line between aggressive-but-lawful marketing and unlawful disparagement is where many disputes are won or lost.

How do I protect a trade secret if a former employee takes it?

Exploiting or disclosing production or business secrets obtained secretly, without permission or otherwise unlawfully is unfair competition under article 55(1)(d), and inducing employees to disclose or obtain their employer's secrets is covered by article 55(1)(b)(3). This applies even where the information leaves through a departing employee. Protection is best built in advance: written confidentiality and non-solicitation clauses, controlled access to sensitive data, and a documented trail showing what the information was and how it was protected. When a leak is discovered, a prompt warning letter and an interim injunction can stop further use before the damage spreads.

How long do I have to bring a claim?

Under article 60, the claims become time-barred one year after the claimant learns that they arose, and in any event three years after they arose. Where the unfair act is also a crime subject to a longer limitation period under the Turkish Penal Code, that longer period applies to the civil claims as well. Because deadlines run quickly, and interim injunctions are most effective early, prompt legal advice matters. Waiting also weakens the evidentiary picture, as advertisements are pulled and correspondence is deleted.

Can unfair competition also be a crime?

Yes. Under article 62 of the Turkish Commercial Code, a person who intentionally commits an act listed in article 55, knowingly gives false or misleading information about their own situation, products or business to have their offers preferred, deceives employees to obtain their employer's secrets, or as employer fails to prevent such an act by staff, is punished on the complaint of a person entitled to sue under article 56 with up to two years' imprisonment or a judicial fine, unless the act constitutes a more serious crime. Under article 63, where the act is committed in a legal entity's business, these rules apply to the members of the organ or the partners who acted or should have acted for it. Criminal and civil routes can run in parallel.

Which court hears an unfair competition case?

Under articles 4 and 5 of the Code, unfair competition claims are commercial cases heard by the Commercial Courts of First Instance, whether or not the parties are merchants. Because these cases frequently turn on technical or accounting questions (how a product was copied, how the defendant's gain should be calculated, how a secret was taken), the court will often appoint experts. A clear, well-documented file from the outset helps at that expert stage.

This page is general information, not legal advice. For advice on your specific situation, speak with a lawyer.

Av. Onur Çalışıcı

The lawyer on your file

Av. Onur Çalışıcı

Founding Attorney · Istanbul Bar Association · Bar reg. no 83426

Lex lata is Latin for “the law as it is”. The office was founded by Av. Onur Çalışıcı, and you deal with Av. Çalışıcı directly from the first meeting to the end of the matter. With foreign clients we write in English and explain what each Turkish document says.

Write to us with what happened and which documents you have. We will read it and get back to you. You can write in English or Turkish.

Last reviewed: June 2026 · LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/onurcalisici

OfficeKarataş Sk. No:6, SNS Plaza Kat:3, Kağıthane, Istanbul

On screen

Beyaz TV · Beyaz Ana Haber · September 2026 · In Turkish

Evicting a tenant who disturbs the neighbours

Why a tenant's unbearable conduct has to be shown with concrete evidence, and the exceptional cases in which the 30-day period may not be required.

Office and events

Gürsel Mah., Karataş Sk. No:6, SNS Plaza Kat:3, Kağıthane / İstanbul · Address and directions

The Lex Lata office in Kağıthane, Istanbul: desks and wall screens showing the Lex Lata logo
The office · Kağıthane, Istanbul
Av. Onur Çalışıcı on the blockchain law panel at Blockchain Expo World, Istanbul, July 2024
Blockchain law panel · Blockchain Expo World, Istanbul · July 2024
A meeting around the table in the Lex Lata meeting room
Meeting room · Kağıthane, Istanbul

SNS Plaza, Kağıthane, IstanbulContact page